would the allies have won ww2 without americabreaking news shooting in greenville, nc

This naturally means that though lack of such supplies like radios and vehicles like trucks would be detrimental, they would not have been critical. Lend-Lease trucks and jeeps put the Russian Army on wheels for the first time ever while US food (including, famously, spam)kept the Russian population going. What were strength estimates of German forces in Budapest and Munich? But when examined by looking past all these ideological and social biases and historical baggage, one faces a rather unconventional conclusion: A quick look at the strategic setup, relative war production and technology level of countries seems to suggest that Ww2 could have been won without United States. This abrupt reversal in policy ended up triggering a world war which would cost over fifty million lives. WebIt must be baldly stated: Germany would have won World War I had the U.S. Army not intervened in France in 1918.The French and British were barely hanging on in 1918. Then there was the fact that its Axis partner, Imperial Japan, didn't join in fighting the Soviet Union. Neither the Allied Powers (France, Britain, Russia, Italy, Japan, and several smaller states) nor the Central Powers (Germany, Austria-Hungary, the Ottoman Empire, and Bulgaria) would have gained everything they wanted from a negotiated settlement. Poland would most likely have joined in the German-led invasion of the Soviet Union in exchange for promises for Germanys support for the return of these lost territories. By June 1944, Soviets were already positioning for their drive into Germany, as can be seen from the state of Eastern Front at that date: Just a month after Normandy, Red Army was already pushing into Germany. One look at the map of southern Europe easily tells even people with non-military education that there is nothing soft about that location at all Italy is hilly, rough terrain, and where Italy connects to Europe is even worse impassable Alps totally clog the north, and beyond Alps there are many more difficult obstacles like Black Forest, or Yugoslavian hilly countryside. This prompted Germany to declare war on the United States, which, in turn, led to the United States to declare war on Germany on December 11, 1941. If Hitler had accepted Czech President Emil Hachas request to make the Czech Republic a German protectorate without actually occupying it with German forces, then he would not have been in violation of the Munich Pact. We have seen a hundred times, especially in American cinema, references to how the help of the USA was indispensable for the allied victory in Europe. There was another sad example of not learning from history. The program sent nearly 2,000 locomotives and innumerable boxcars to the Soviet Union. Some of the add-ons on this site are powered by. Overcoming massive defeats and colossal losses over the first 18 months of the war, the Red Army was able to reorganize and rebuild to form a juggernaut that marched all the way to Berlin. Photo: Museum of the U.S. Air Force (Courtesy Photo). Stalin said that the allies won World War II with British brains, American cash, and Russian blood. The highlight of the event was the lowering of the captured German standards, which were flung down in front of Lenin's Tomb to be trampled by Soviet marshals riding white horses. JavaScript is disabled. You are using an out of date browser. This would have reduced investment in the US arms industry and thus slowed it growth or even caused plants to close. It was quite well equipped with 9,248 tanks, 6,584 artillery pieces and. Instead of the four Allied powers the United States, Great Britain, France, and the Soviet Union then standing together in a final Allied Victory Parade in a defeated Berlin in September 1944, the Germans could have celebrated the defeat of the British, marching through London and Moscow as they did Paris. Yet, the Germans lacked in numerous other ways. After the war, it was transferred to civilian aviation, carrying passengers over the frozen tundra above the Arctic Circle. Keeping America out of the war should have been the goal for Germany. Churchill would have been ousted by a pragmatist, perhaps RAB Butler or Sir John Simon who would have sought peace with Hitler in exchange for some degree of self determination, which would in effect have counted for little. It is hard to overestimate the negative impact Hitlers foolhardy violation of the Munich Pact had upon Chamberlain. The war might have ended in 1915 or 1916 with a negotiated peace It was a great symbol of prestige for the resurgent Kriegsmarine, but the money and material could have been utilized in a larger U-Boat force. So we have US as a major factor in Western Front. The Soviet Union suffered the most casualties in the conflict, and the issue is highly emotional for many Russians. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson, fifteen years older than FDR and highly respected by him as an open-minded, patriotic Republican, had had Hopkins to lunch in his office at the Pentagon the day before he left for Tehran expressly to explore how they could stiffen the presidents resolve. Britain, regardless of their stubborn perseverance, was undermanned and under supplied compared to Germany, as evidenced by quick reversal of the early victories they won in North Africa against Italy, after Rommel landed. Couldn't the 1 million strong 21st army group have advanced that deep? We cannot measure the distance of the Soviet economy from the point of collapse in 1942, but it seems beyond doubt that collapse was near. My British born-American raised Mother has told me that my British born-Britsh raised Aunt Bethel always claimed that "Spam saved England" ---because it was ration free. The Short History Of The Great Patriotic War, also from 1948, acknowledged the Lend-Lease shipments, but concluded: "Overall this assistance was not significant enough to in any way exert a decisive influence over the course of the Great Patriotic War. In conclusion, if Germany won WW1, the German government would have been considerably more powerful and the Austro-Hungarian and Ottoman Empires would have lasted longer. Thats assuming they were able to make advances. The Allies likely would have followed suit by making peace with Nazi Germany, too, thus ending World War II after a mere two weeks of fighting. In addition, much of the $31 billion worth of aid sent to the United Kingdom was also passed on to the Soviet Union via convoys through the Barents Sea to Murmansk. What were the 3 reasons the US entered WW1? Prev 1 2 3 Jul 28, 2022 1 #41 Garrison Donor Tiredworker said: without the US sending in Millions of troops and supplying material I dont see an Entente victory. Germany lost the First World War largely because it couldn't fight a sustained two-front war. The 76-year-old's private plane is expected to land at Aberdeen WebFact: Adolf Hitler Could Have Won World War II As we celebrate the ending of the war 75 years ago, know this: victory for the Allies was never guaranteed, and historians agree The captain, two crew members, and six passengers had left earlier in an ill-fated effort to get help. The disparage of manpower and supplies in the lineups are impressive, which makes what Germans achieved in North Africa even more noteworthy. For asking casual questions about History. But without the Allies in his back, Hitler would have sent all his Isolation was no longer an option. Germany built no heavy bombers and lacked any truly effective long range aircraft. But for the sake of a full spectrum analysis, lets assume that Lend Lease was tied to US joining the war, and if US did not join, there would be no Lend Lease. Whether Stalin would have still invaded and annexed the Baltic States, eastern Finland, eastern Poland and northeastern Romania from 19391940 is unclear. More from the necessity of preventing a total Soviet takeover of Europe, coupled by the promises FDR gave years ago, than any initiative or lack of malice on the part of Churchill. Throw in the fact that Germany's victories in Poland, Denmark, Norway, the Netherlands, Belgium, and France didn't really help this tied down vast amounts of men and material that could have been better used on the frontlines in the Soviet Union. Today to win a war even against a regional power there is a process that often involves "coalition" building. Plausibility check: could a better handled Italy have become France's partner in enforcing the Versailles treaty? Here are some actions that Germany might have taken to achieve its territorial objectives without fighting the Western Powers. How many would you like? We would have lost North Africa and the far east. This is the first in a series of five articles providing critical analysis as to how Germany Might Have Won World War II. This, in turn, would have delayed the Soviet invasion of Finland until 1940. Many experts have considered the US impossible to invade because of its major industries, reliable and fast supply lines, large geographical size, geographic location, population size, and difficult regional features. Rommel had scarce manpower and supplies at his disposal, yet he made good use of what he had, and Britain succeeded in stopping Germans only with amassing of massive resources and manpower in firstFirst Battle of El Alamein. A monument in Fairbanks, Alaska, to the American pilots who flew almost 8,000 U.S. planes to Alaska and to the Soviet pilots who flew them on to Siberia as part of Lend-Lease. At the same time, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini could have made demands for France and Britain to honor their promises to Italy for more Yugoslav territory in return for entering World War One on the side of the Allies. He rapidly began to simplify construction procedures for the T-34 and within less than a year the number of man-hours required to produce T-34s was cut in half. But it cannot be denied that the Americans sent us materiel without which we could not have formed our reserves or continued the war. Roosevelt also contributed to Soviet stabilization. This was the final blow to Japanese war effort and broke the camels back, by the way. But we have much to learn from that achievement as we face our troubles today. By D-Day, Germany had only 600 fighters left, essentially nothing. WebIf the US continued to send supplies to the Allies, then the Allies probably win, nothing else appearing. Britain, and probably France as well, would have likely pressured the Poles to accept such a reasonable compromise proposal and informed them they would not support Poland militarily if Poland rejected it just as they told Czech leaders after Munich. Inevitably so, since British were still in the war, and even though British and Canadians were frustrated in a grand fashion when they attempted a landing inDieppe Raidto test German defenses in regard to a possible landing, the risk of a potential landing was still there. It is no exaggeration to say that America won the war abroad and the peace at home at the same time. On the Soviet side, the Western Front still had 328 tanks left in thirteen tank brigades and the 1st Guards Motorized Rifle Division (1GRMD) by the end of October: thirty-three KV-1, 175 T-34, forty-three BT, fifty T-26 and thirty-two T-60. So even though Japan could easily cripple British presence in SE Asia easily with its Navy (they mostly did that already), it is rather difficult to imagine Japan subduing India which would turn into another China for Japan. Unless you can refute the other scenarios for Allied victory before 1941 then the answer to the OPs question remains yes. Robert Coalson is a senior correspondent for RFE/RLwho covers Russia, the Balkans, and Eastern Europe. The result would have been an eastern block streching to the atlantic and a much weaker post war US. Therefore, US dealing with Japan definitely helped allies. But the Soviet Union was never alone: Months before the United States formally entered the war, it had already begun providing massive military and economic assistance to its Soviet ally through the Lend-Lease program. Yet, here again is a case of the wrong equipment. The United States later declared war on German ally Austria-Hungary on December 7, 1917. 2 US taking on Japan and preventing them from attacking anyone else isan important contribution, but especially in the light of #1, it doesnt seem to be critical. The root cause of world war II is industrial and imperialist circles in the west fostering and backing fascist movements, When we look into the reality on the ground circa the time period when Operation Sea Lion was supposed to, Without demeaning the sacrifice of those who fought in the ranks of the British, lets do a simple review: In. "Without Lend-Lease, the Red Army would not have had about one-third of its ammunition, half of its aircraft, or half of its tanks. Afterwards, he sent troops to occupy the Czech Republic on May 15, 1939 in flagrant violation of the terms of Munich Pact. WebWe would like to show you a description here but the site wont allow us. That bogged down the men and material that could have been used in the invasion of the Soviet Union. Many contributed to relief efforts; others volunteered as ambulance drivers or nurses, or even as pilots and soldiers. Britain still would have prevailed. The Americans provided vital explosives and gunpowder. Without the machines we received through Lend-Lease, we would have lost the war.". US started the war with equipment rather sub par for European front (Tanks, Aircraft especially), and when first batches of these supplies arrived in USSR, they were already unusable in the main front except a few items and they were in small numbers. Additionally, without bombing, and the need to maintain a large enough army to fight on several fronts, there would have been less need to use forced labor in the factories, thus boosting production. But such aircraft were unable to defeat Great Britain. The only viable route seems to be towards the West from Northern Italy, from a narrow region towards France. Considering all the above information, it is reasonable to conclude that the war could be won without participation of US, or even Lend Lease, but it would cost much more lives and take much longer, and affect broader segments of world population. Whereas Japan would not benefit from the lack of resources and infrastructure in these areas. With Great Britain in the war it meant Germany was dragged into various side campaigns from Greece to North Africa. It was really the only time Nazi Germany had actually declared war on an enemy, and it needed not to have happened. On December 8, 1941, one day after the attack on Pearl Harbor, the United States declared war on Japan. on politics, society, foreign policy, philosophy and tech. Myth: Japan could have won World War II, if only the Japanese had bombed the oil depots at Pearl Harbor in addition to the ships. Italy was a reliable partner but its army was neither prepared nor even eager for war. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. During 1942, the Red Army lost over 15,000 tanks, including 1,200 KV-1, 6,600 T-34s and 7,200 T-60/70s.100 About half of the 10,500 Lend-Lease tanks (3,000 British, 7,500 USA) delivered in 1942 were also lost.101 Soviet industry built 24,231 tanks in 1942, including 12,535 T-34s and 2,426 KV-1s. In 1941 Germany only produced 2,900 tanks a number that increased to 17,300 by 1944! This gave Poland the footing it needed to refuse all of Hitlers subsequent attempts to negotiate the return of this Polish occupied German city. On May 11, 1947, 27 people were rescued, having spent nearly three weeks in the icebound wreck. By the same token, the extraordinary pitch of mobilization achieved by the Soviet Union in 1942 and early 1943 was not sustainable. Of course, we are not taking tactical considerations into account. The thing that is certain that war would last even longer in that case, and cost many more lives. But we must also note that Lend Lease started without US joining the war, on FDRs initiative, andit would be there until the end of the war even if US did not join the war. The Lend-Lease act was enacted in March 1941 and authorized the United States to provide weapons, provisions, and raw materials to strategically important countries fighting Germany and Japan -- primarily, the United Kingdom, the Soviet Union, and China. Given the way the events of the war played out, there was no other foreseeable outcome other than her defeat. WebTo give an idea: IIRC, just before Japan's defeat, in one year the United States pumped out as much material as Japan did over the course of the war. This Douglas is the only Lend-Lease aircraft that remains in Russia.". Theres rather broad agreement among mainstream historians on this. You must log in or register to reply here. Nevertheless, British Lend-Lease tanks helped the Red Army to restock its tank units until domestic production could catch up and are estimated to have comprised about 10 per cent of the tanks defending Moscow in NovemberDecember 1941. On March 12, 1943, the plane was given to the Soviet Air Force in Fairbanks, Alaska, and given the registration USSR-N238.

Westridge Commons Morgantown, Wv, Bathurst Show 2021 Tickets, Weathernation Meteorologists, Tax Delinquent Properties For Sale List Oklahoma, Articles W